|
June 9, 2007 Equality - When a Definition Makes a World of Difference |
|||
|
This post was part of a discussion on free
markets vs. communism.
Jefferson
Babeuf
You raise an important point when you talk about
Keith Joseph's argument that they needed more
bankruptcies and more millionaires. This really
all comes down to the definition of equality. In
the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson
wrote:
We hold these truths to be self-evident,
that all men are created equal, that they
are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—
In
this meaning of equality, equality is a right of
birth. We start out equal. We do not have kings
and classes that are presumed better because of
the status of their birth. All people have the
right to pursue happiness, but there is no
guarantee of happiness. These rights are
inherent in the individual and not the group to
whom the individual is born.
http://markbarnes.us/blog%202-5-05.htm
However, this definition of equality took a bad
turn in the French Revolution. Babeuf and the
Conspiracy of Equals rejected the American idea
of equality for an outcome based definition of
equality. Equality meant no difference in
outcomes.
Society must be made to operate in such a
way that it eradicates once and for all the
desire of a man to become richer, or wiser,
or more powerful than others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois-No%C3%ABl_Babeuf
The problem is that to guarantee outcomes among
people who are not identically gifted, capable
or motivated has historically meant the
application of force by government in order to ensure equal
results. In communism's 70 plus year history,
its
belief in the state's right to cause equality in
outcomes cost 100 million lives around the world.
http://markbarnes.us/blog%209-10-05.htm |
|||